The calculated profit per unit for base-case, worst-case is, and best-case for the management of Brinkley corporation is:
<h3>The Profit per unit for base-case:</h3>
45 - 1 1- 24 - 3 = $7
<h3>Profit per unit for worst case:</h3>
45 - 12 - 25 - 3 = $3 per unit
<h3>Profit per unit for best case:</h3>
45 - 10 - 20 - 3 = 12$ per unit
b. The mean profit per unit is given as $7.05
c. The reason the simulation approach is preferable is due to the fact that it can help to determine the probability of profit as a particular amount, unlike the what-if scenario analysis.
It can also create different scenarios for possible resources.
d. The probability of the fact that the profit per unit woul be less than 5 is 9%
Read more on risk analysis here: brainly.com/question/6955504
The earliest elections will come effective on January 1, 2016 for case a, b, d anf January 1, 2017 for rest options.
<h3>For different
alternative scenarios:</h3>
a.) Jane is on top of things and makes the election on January 1, 2016.
January 1, 2016
b.) Jane is mostly on top of things and makes the election on January 15, 2016.
January 1, 2016
c.)Jane makes the election on February 10, 2016. She needed a little time to convince a C corporation shareholder to sell its stock to a qualifying shareholder. That process took all of January, and she was glad to have it over with.
January 1, 2017
d.)Jane makes the election on March 14, 2016.
January 1, 2016
e.)Jane makes the election on February 5, 2016. One of the shareholders refused to consent to the S election. He has since sold his shares (on January 15, 2016) to another shareholder who consented to the election.
January 1, 2017
To view similar question about election scenarios, refer to:
brainly.com/question/17101454
#SPJ4
Existing business with a proven record. When you ask for investments, the lending institution will most definitely ask for your financial track record. They would want to know if you are a good paymaster because they will need the assurance that you can pay them back. Even if you have a really original idea and want to start a new business, there will still be some reservation if you have no track record because the lenders do not know if you are trustworthy or not. Unlike if you already have a proven record that you are a good paymaster, then you at least have proof that you can pay back.
Answer:
Design Capacity Utilization= 75%
Production efficiency = 120%
Explanation:
Okay, so the question is to determine both the design and the effective capacity utilization measures and make a conclusion from there
1. The Capacity Utilization = The Actual Output/ Design Capacity
Actual Output= 300 hamburgers a day
Design Capacity = 400 Hamburgers a day
Therefore Capacity Utilization = 300 hamburgers/400 hamburgers x 100
= 75%
2. The Efficiency of the production = The Actual Output / The Effective Capacity
Actual Output = 300 Hamburgers a day
Effective Capacity = 250 hamburgers
= 300 Hamburgers/ 250 Hamburgers x 100
= 120%
Conclusion
First we see that the actual utilization of capacity is more better than the effective capacity and this is good. Also, the Design Capacity is higher than the actual capacity utilization which should also be expected as design capacity is a calculation based on ideal conditions that may be not realistic in real life conditions.
Answer:
(I) Price elasticity = 1/6
(II) the $2.5 price gives the higher revenue: 1,250
Explanation:
(I) price elasticity
↑Q (500 - 300)/((500+ 300) / 2)
↑Q 200 / (800/2) = 200/400 = 1/2
↑P (3.5 - 2.5)/((3.5+2.5)/2)
↑P 1/(6/2) = 1/3
(II) total revenue
3.5 x 300 = 1,050
2.5 x 500 = 1,250
