Answer:
a) the oscillation of this field is in phase, when the magnetic field goes in the negative direction of y, the elective field goes in the positive direction of the z axis
b) the direction of the magnetic field perpendicular to this electric field and the speed in the negative x the magnetic field goes in the x direction and in the direction (1, - 1.1)
Explanation:
a) the polarization the determined wave oscillates the electric field, which is the z axis
As the wave travels on the negative x-axis and the magnetic field is perpendicular, this field goes on the positive y-axis
the oscillation of this field is in phase, when the magnetic field goes in the negative direction of y, the elective field goes in the positive direction of the z axis
be) in the case of a polarization in the xi plane the magnetic field must go in the direction of the magnetic field perpendicular to this electric field and the speed in the negative x the magnetic field goes in the x direction and in the direction (1, - 1.1)
Answer:
a. one-half as great
Explanation:
The power developed by the first lifter is one-half as great as that of the second person.
Power is defined as the rate at which work is done;
Power = 
Since the two lifters do the same work at different time, let us estimate their power;
P₁ = 
P₂ = 
We see that for P₁, power is half of the work done whereas in P₂ power is the same as the work done.
Therefore,
The power of the first weight lifter is one-half the second lifter.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Your stomach, as in JUST your stomach?
Well the role of your stomach is to break down large clumps of food. Without that it would be very hard to impossible to digest food.<span />
Answer:
the clown can be put on a sealion and the other clown can hold a lot of peole he help a clown that was tall and heivy
Explanation:
