Answer:
<em>some </em><em>slogans </em><em>could </em><em>include</em><em>:</em>
- <em>corruption</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>a </em><em>silent </em><em>killer</em>
- <em>corruption</em><em> </em><em>hurts </em><em>all </em><em>of </em><em>us</em>
- <em>champions </em><em>don't</em><em> </em><em>cheat</em>
- <em>time </em><em>to </em><em>unite </em><em>against</em><em> </em><em>corruption</em>
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em>
Answer: Nagging should not be done
Explanation: Nagging is the activity in which a person starts to find the fault in another person in persistently.This type of behavior in continuous way can lead to irritate or annoy the other person.
The case mentioned in the question also describes about the nagging behavior showed by Bobbi towards her friend Charla. Bobbi is continuously finding mistake in behavior of Charla that she does not take enough stand for herself in the office. Thus, Charla is getting irritated with this act.
Answer:
the correct answer is option B
Answer:
No theocracies are true democracies. no secular government are theocracies. Thus, some secular government are true democracies.
d. deductive invalid
Explanation:
- The given statement is deductive as well as invalid.
- Such a process of logic in which we use the logic of two or more statements to get a final logical conclusion is known as deductive logic.
- In the given situation, we have concluded that some secular governments are true democracies on the basis of no theocracies are true democracies and no secular government are theocracies.
- So although, it is deductive logic but it is invalid as well.
