“Disadvantages. In the first years of a new nonprofit, it may seem counterproductive to implement term limits for board members. Serving on the board of a start-up nonprofit that lacks resources is rarely prestigious and is typically labor intensive since most start-ups lack staff. It can be difficult to find qualified directors who possess the requisite passion for the cause, understanding of the mission, and willingness to work. Another disadvantage of term limits is that the organization will spend more time and resources to recruit and educate new directors and will lose the group cohesion that comes with directors who have worked together for a long time. Additionally, the organization may lose directors who are fervent supporters of the organization and the mission.
Advantages. While the above points may lead incorporators to create a board without term limits, it is important to remember that there are also many positive aspects of term limits that may outweigh the negative aspects. For example, an organization with term limits may be better able to attract active and involved members of the community who are not able to make a long term commitment to the organization. Term limits allow busy executives and community leaders to serve the organization and bring fresh new ideas that they may not otherwise have been able to share had they been required to make a longer-term commitment.”
Answer:
Qualified Health Claim
Explanation:
A Qualified Health Claim is a claim that is permitted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which is supported by scientific evidence as regards a food substance and its relationship to a disease.
A qualified health claim is usually based on few evidences compared to authorized health claim. For example, when a new or emerging evidence of a food in relation to its ability to reduce the risk of a particular disease is found, but not concrete enough for the FDA to approve an Authorized Heath claim, the FDA then issues a Qualified Health Claim.
Therefore, in the case of selenium, the FDA approved a Qualified Health Claim.
Chambliss critiques the notion of talent or natural ability as it relates to excellence because the natural ability is combined with a lot of hard work.
In his first book, Crime and the Legal Process, Chambliss argued that black criminal abuse was far more prominent than middle-class whites and that African Americans had a disproportionately high rate of the arrest.
According to Chambliss's article "A Sociological Analysis of the Laws of Vagrant", the increased severity of penalties for vagrancy was due to major changes in the economy and social structure.
Chambliss critiques' major contribution to criminology was to increase our knowledge of who makes laws, how and why they are enforced, and who benefits.
Learn more about Chambliss at
brainly.com/question/14928762
#SPJ4
It was because they didn't want to pay for tax
Answer:
Active (Niche-Picking) Genotype-Environment
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various sociologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question these instances reflect Active (Niche-Picking) Genotype-Environment. This term is defined as when children and adolescents seek out certain environments they find compatible and stimulating. In this situation both Students joined activities or groups that interested and stimulated their likes.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
