The pattern is adding 2 stars on top of the previous figure, so figure number 4 would look like this:
* *
* *
* *
* *
Since the pattern is adding 2 stars every time, the explicit formula (for the number of stars) would be
Since when n=1, i.e. figure 1, we have 2*1=2 stars
when n=2, i.e. figure 2, we have 2*2=4 stars
when n=3, i.e. figure 3, we have 2*3=6 stars
and so on.
The recursive formula lays on the fact that we add 2 stars to the previous figure, which means that the fomula is
In fact, what we just wrote is simply "the number of stars at a given iteration is the number of stars at the previous iteration, plus 2.
Answer:69,420
Step-by-step explanation:
9+10=21
Answer:
No it is not
Step-by-step explanation:
The median is 84200
The mean is 85300
Low income is 65100
High income is 103400
From this information, we can see a skewed data. The mean would not be a good estimate value. Rather the center (median) would be more appropriate.
When we calculate the middle value for this data
65100+103400 = 168500/2 = 84250
84250 is closer to the median score of 84200. The median is best in the presence of outliers.
$.50 x 5000 = $2500
The pizza shop printed 5000 menus.
Answer:
That is 52 calories per apple.
Step-by-step explanation: