Answer:Labeling theory
Explanation:
Labeling theory states that people become what we call them,this means a person may start to behave or identity with the names that has been used to label them. It relate to a self-fulfilling prophecy in which whta people believe about someone actual end up becoming true. Labeling theory believes that deviance behavior bdoesjtbkust happen but it is driven by negative label given to the minority group by the majority group.
Living in the Gutpa empire was different than the Maurya empire, because although the people had a duty to obey the emperor, some also were a kind of (CITIZEN) , with political rights and obligations.
Explanation:
what is the importance of institution in the economy
Answer: c
. The passage describes a federation. The central government has final authority.
Explanation:
The United States is a federation which means that although there are various states and these states have control over their internal affairs, they are still under the final authority of the central government and the laws that it passes.
This is reinforced by the excerpt above from the U.S. Constitution that all Judges - custodians of the law - in every state are to be bound by the laws passed by and treaties gotten into, by the Central government as this is the Supreme Law of the Land.
Answer: there is reason to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest
Explanation: Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law enforcement officers to eitherdemonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from being tampered with by the arrestee
in order to justify a vehicular search without a warrant conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured.
The defendant in the case was Rodney Gant who was arrested in a friend's yard for driving with a suspended license. His vehicle was searched after he and his friends had been arrested and secured in police cars, upon which the officers found a weapon as well as a bag of cocaine. He was also charged with possession of a narcotic with intent to distribute.
Gant's lawyer, Thomas Jacobs argued and the court agreed that the search was unconstitutional and didn't fulfil either of the two conditions stated above for a warrantless search.
