Well, for one, Haiti really didn't have anything to offer the United States. No territory. Nothing to trade. Nothing really. But also, the idea of Africans rising up against an oppressive white government and overthrowing them made the United States very nervous, especially since we, at the time, had institutionalized slavery and a culture that was very much steeped in racism. Basically, we were afraid that if we supported the revolution in Haiti, it would encourage our own slaves to revolt against Southern slaveholders.
Answer and explanation:
My reaction to this idea is the following. By searching the definition of lex talionis, we find that it is a principle that says, that when we (as individuals) must decide a punishment for someone who acted the wrong way on a certain circumnstance, said punishment should be thought about and applied according to the degree and kind of mistake any other persons had made. So, taking into account the etymology of the definition, I believe that what is established in this task is not correct. Lex talionis it is, in fact, prescriptive rather than proscriptive.
Answer:
totally determined by in what regards it is done.
Explanation:
can you be a little specific?
Answer:
1)Most people are migrating towards the Terai region because of good facilities.
2)People are migrating for farming because of the fertile land.
3)Population is also increasing due to the access of infrastructures of developments and development of industries and trade.
4)Because of good transportation
5)Also people of the Mountain and Hilly region are going to Terai because there are many employment opportunities.
Explanation:
Are there certain words to use with these sentences or is it just what makes sense?
