In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
Answer:
78%, no he didn't score high enough
Step-by-step explanation:
A = 3,953 in²
You find the area of the whole triangle:
1/2bh = 1/2(63+31)(63+62) = 5875
Then subtract the missing rectangle:
lw = (62)(31) = 1922
5875 - 1922 = 3953 inches
Since you're multiplying inches by inches, it's inches².
The area of the square is 9, the area of all the semi circles added together is 15.7, when you add them together you get 24.7