Answer:
E. generalized anxiety disorder is the correct answer.
Explanation:
An individual who could trace a picture of a bicycle with his or her finger but could not recognize it as a bicycle is most likely to have sustained damage to the visual association area.
Explanation:
Visual association or association cortex area is the cortical area present in between the auditory, visual, somatosensory cortices.
All these cortices integrate through sensory, gustatory, visual, and auditory impulses. This complete sensory integration aids to recognize shapes, form, image, texture of various objects and their interrelation through higher-order association.
Damage to this visual association areas cause associative visual agnosia. With this condition, a person although is able to see or feel an object cannot recognize the object due to impairment of attention/recognition skill, intelligence.
A visually agnostic person, although can see, cannot identify an object by his/her sight; but can feel the object through touch, smell, or sound.
Equity theory- people are most satisfied with a relationship when the ratio between benefits <span>and costs is similar for both partners.</span>
<span>Real and Nominal GDP differ on what they measure. The Real GDP measures goods and services in the economy with prices adjusted for inflation, while Nominal GDP just takes the prices of the current year. The difference and the point of this would be that if one measures Nominal GDP you don't know whether the GDP went up because there were more goods and services produced or because the inflation rate went up. Real GDP measures the actual growth of the economy with adjusted prices to one similar base year. So you can see that the problem with using nominal GDP to measure the growth of the economy is that one doesn't know whether the economy grew or whether the value of the dollar just fell (aka inflation went up). Hope this helps!</span>
Answer:
d. The first statement more likely uses emotive language and the second is more likely a fact.
Explanation:
The statement of the leader of the political rivalry includes highly emotional language that may or may not be accurate in describing reality. Even if it was true that farmers are suffering, the politician is likely exagerating the claims in order to rile up his supporters.
The statement of the economist is a fact. The economist is citing evidence, and is not expressing an opinion on the subject matter.
