I dont have options but i can sayEach of these questions is asking you to figure out how g(x) would be graphed based on some other function, f(x), except we're gonna make some changes to f(x) first. For example, let's look at part (a). You're told that g(x) = 2f(x)+3. 1. Whatever f(x) is, 2f(x) would take all of the y values and double them.2. Whatever that turns out to be, "+3" would add 3 to every y value. So, to translate (1, -2), first we double the y value...so that'd be -2 * 2, or -4. Then we add 3, which gives 1. So, the point (1, -2) becomes (1, 1). [EDIT: Um, no, -4 + 1 isn't 1. It's -1. My bad! MBW] Part (b) is a little bit trickier: 1. Whatever f(x) is, by adding 1 to x, it actually shifts the graph left by 1, even though it sorta feels like you should be shifting it 1 to the right. Let's not get too far into the details here, so for the moment, f(x+1) means "shift the graph of f to the left by 1." In other words, subtract 1 from x to get the new point. 2. Whatever f(x+1) is, then the "-3" would subtract 3 to every y value. So, if (1, -2) was on the original graph, then f(x+1) would be shifted to the left by 1...so that's (0, -2). And then, we subtract 3 from y, so that'd be (0, -5). Basically, anything inside the parentheses, like f(x+1), messes with the x coordinate of the point, and anything outside the parentheses, like -f(x) or f(x) + 3, messes with the y coordinate. For the last two, I'll give you a few hints and see if you can take it from there. For part (c): f(2x), even though you think it might double the value of x, actually divides the value of x by 2.For part (d): the trick here is to ignore the "-x" until the last step. Deal with the f(x-1) first (which shifts the x coordinate...which way?), then the negative outside of f(x) (which flips the sign of the y coordinate), then the +3 outside of f(x)...and then, at the end, the "-x" would flip the sign of the x coordinate. I hope this helps point you in the right direction!
First, we need to convert all the fractions to have the same denominator. 10 and 25 are both multiples of 100, so 100 would be appropriate.
Sam has a 7/25 chance. Because we want ?/100, something needs to change. To get from 25 to 100, you need to times 25 by 4, right? So, do the same with the 7. 7 x 4 = 28. Therefore Sam has a 28/100 chance.
Sue has 3/10. Using the same method, we can see that 3 needs to be multiplied by 10 (because 10 times 10 = 100). So Sue has a 30/100 chance.
Tom is already in the fraction we like, so just keep this as 21/100.
Now, add 28/100, 30/100 and 21/100 to get 79/100.
Because won of them will get the role of class president, we know that the probability adds to 1. To get a full probability (100/100, or 1), what needs to be added to 79/100?
Another way of going about this is 100/100-79/100. The answer is 21/100
The probability of Liz winning is 21/100.
Let me know if this is still unclear, I would be more than happy to explain in more detail if necessary :)