I dont have options but i can sayEach of these questions is asking you to figure out how g(x) would be graphed based on some other function, f(x), except we're gonna make some changes to f(x) first. For example, let's look at part (a). You're told that g(x) = 2f(x)+3. 1. Whatever f(x) is, 2f(x) would take all of the y values and double them.2. Whatever that turns out to be, "+3" would add 3 to every y value. So, to translate (1, -2), first we double the y value...so that'd be -2 * 2, or -4. Then we add 3, which gives 1. So, the point (1, -2) becomes (1, 1). [EDIT: Um, no, -4 + 1 isn't 1. It's -1. My bad! MBW] Part (b) is a little bit trickier: 1. Whatever f(x) is, by adding 1 to x, it actually shifts the graph left by 1, even though it sorta feels like you should be shifting it 1 to the right. Let's not get too far into the details here, so for the moment, f(x+1) means "shift the graph of f to the left by 1." In other words, subtract 1 from x to get the new point. 2. Whatever f(x+1) is, then the "-3" would subtract 3 to every y value. So, if (1, -2) was on the original graph, then f(x+1) would be shifted to the left by 1...so that's (0, -2). And then, we subtract 3 from y, so that'd be (0, -5). Basically, anything inside the parentheses, like f(x+1), messes with the x coordinate of the point, and anything outside the parentheses, like -f(x) or f(x) + 3, messes with the y coordinate. For the last two, I'll give you a few hints and see if you can take it from there. For part (c): f(2x), even though you think it might double the value of x, actually divides the value of x by 2.For part (d): the trick here is to ignore the "-x" until the last step. Deal with the f(x-1) first (which shifts the x coordinate...which way?), then the negative outside of f(x) (which flips the sign of the y coordinate), then the +3 outside of f(x)...and then, at the end, the "-x" would flip the sign of the x coordinate. I hope this helps point you in the right direction!
There is a 0.13% probability that the random sample of 100 nontraditional students have a mean GPA greater than 3.65.
Step-by-step explanation:
Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean and standard deviation , the zscore of a measure X is given by
After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
For this problem, we have that:
Based on the study results, we can assume the population mean and standard deviation for the GPA of nontraditional students is and .
We have a sample of 100 students, so we need to find the standard deviation of the sample, to use in the place of in the z score formula.
.
What is the probability that the random sample of 100 nontraditional students have a mean GPA greater than 3.65?
This is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when . So
A zscore of 3 has a pvalue of 0.9987.
So, there is a 1-0.9987 = 0.0013 = 0.13% probability that the random sample of 100 nontraditional students have a mean GPA greater than 3.65.