Answer:
I am pretty sure there are 10 people in line.
Since Ashley is the seventh person in line, we can deduce that <u><em>there are 6 people in front of her</em></u>.
Since the amount of people in front of her is "twice as many people as there are behind her," we can divide the value of the people in front of her in half to get the value of people behind her.
6/2 is 3, so <em>there are </em><u><em>3 people behind Ashley</em></u><em>. </em>
Now, lets add the amount of people in front of Ashley to the amount of people behind her. 3 + 6 = 9, and since Ashley is also in the line, we should add 1 to the sum.
9 + 1 = 10, so <u><em>there are 10 people in the line</em></u>.
Answer:
x = ±i√2
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
Equality Properties
Multiplication Property of Equality
Division Property of Equality
Addition Property of Equality
Subtraction Property of Equality<u>
</u>
<u>Algebra II</u>
Imaginary root <em>i</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
<em>Identify</em>
5x² - 2 = -12
<u>Step 2: Solve for </u><em><u>x</u></em>
- [Addition Property of Equality] Add 2 on both sides: 5x² = -10
- [Division Property of Equality] Divide 5 on both sides: x² = -2
- [Equality Property] Square root both sides: x = ±√-2
- Rewrite: x = ±√-1 · √2
- Simplify: x = ±i√2
Answer:
CD = 45
Step-by-step explanation:
CE = 180
( x + 6 ) + ( 4x - 21 ) = 180
5x - 15 = 180
5x = 195
x = 39
substitute x in CD
CD = x + 6
CD = 39 + 6
CD = 45
Answer: 7 candy bars
Step-by-step explanation:
First we need to subtract the cost of the magazine from the total cost
$34-$6=$28
Now the $28 that remains is the cost of all the candy bars, so if we divide by the price, we will get the amount.
$28/$4=7 candy bars
One way to capture the domain of integration is with the set

Then we can write the double integral as the iterated integral

Compute the integral with respect to
.

Compute the remaining integral.

We could also swap the order of integration variables by writing

and

and this would have led to the same result.

