The answer to this question is "Fixed Cost." this is because it doesn't change so it's fixed on one price!
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
We have to use MM proposition that cost of equity will change itself in such a manner so that it can take care of its debt.
Cost of equity:
= WACC of all equity firm + (WACC of all equity - Cost of debt ) × (Debt -to-equity ratio)
At the beginning, when there was no debt,
WACC = cost of equity = 10%
Levered cost of equity:
= 10% + ( 10% - 6%) × 0.2
= 10.8%
Therefore, Taggart's levered cost of equity would be closest to 11%.
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
Answer:
Change in M1 $400
Changd in M2 $0
Explanation:
The money which is been held by individuals in savings accounts is part of the M2 money supply, but its not part ofthe M1 money supply.
Hence when Jane withdraws $400 cash from her savings account,the M1 money supply will increases by $400. However, the M2 money supply does not tend to change reason been that the M1 money supply is included as part of the M2 money
Change in M1 $400
Changd in M2 $0
