The partial quotient is 23
The expression which represents the other factor, or factors, of the given polynomial is option (C) (2x-1)(x+1)
A cubic equation in algebra is a one-variable equation of the form ax3+bx2+cx+d=0 where an is nonzero. The roots of the cubic function defined by the left side of this equation are the solutions to this equation.
Given expression 2x³-3x²-3x+2 whose one of factor is (x-2)
We have to find second factor of given equation
First we will be rational root theorem to given expression so will get following expression:
So one factor is (x-1) and now simplifying 
we get 2x² - 5x +2 and the factor of 2x² - 5x +2 will be (2x-1)(x-2)
Hence the expression which represents the other factor, or factors, of the given polynomial is option (C) (2x-1)(x+1)
Learn more about Polynomial here:
brainly.com/question/4142886
#SPJ10
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
1. Ok so first I would find 22% of 212,000 to do that you do: 22 divide 100 = 0.22
2. Now that you’ve turned 22% into a decimal as 0.22 you find what 22% of 212,000 is like so: 0.22x212,000 =46,640
3. Now that you have to reduce 212,000 but 22% to do this you just subtract: 212,000-46,640= 165,360
They would purchase the house for $165,360
Solving the inequality, it is found that the correct interpretation of the solution is:
Reina's family can drive 83 more miles before they need to refill the gas tank.
The amount x of miles they can still travel is modeled by the following inequality:
To solve it, we treat it similarly to an equality, hence:
Hence:
Reina's family can drive 83 more miles before they need to refill the gas tank.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/11713066
