Answer:
A. Paulo's level is −34.42 meters lower than Vic's level.
Step-by-step explanation:
-104.93 - (-70.51) = -104.93 + 70.51 = -34.42
Answer:
5. 1
6. Kari is not correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
5. All like terms can be combined. There will be one term remaining after they are.
___
6. The appropriate factoring is x(x+1). This is not the same as x(2x+1).
In order to show equivalence, you need to show that the expressions produce the same result for as many different values of x as the degree of the expression plus 1. That is, you'd need to show equivalence for <em>3 different values of x</em>, as a minimum for this second-degree expression.
Answer:
Neither
Step-by-step explanation:
They both have the same probability because 2/5 and 0.4 have the same value.
Ill show you step by step.
This is what the equation should look like
Y=Initial value(1+/- Increasing or Decreasing value)^2 Which stands for time

So you need to do 1.0525 to the 2nd power Which equals 1.10775625
So now you need to do 15,000(1.10775625)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which equals <span>16616 rounding to the nearest Ones
16616.3 rounding to the nearest tenth</span>
Answer:
- a. 1 / 13
- b. 3 / 13
- c. 10 / 13
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>a.</h3>
There are four 5's in the deck. This means that, from 52 possible cards to drawn, we have 4 chances of drawing a 5. This means that the probability will be:


<h3>
b.</h3>
For every suit, there are three face cards, J, Q and K. There are 4 suits, so, the total number of face cards its:

The total possible cards are, still, 52, so, the probability will be


<h3>
c.</h3>
We know that the card drawn must be a face card, o not being a face card. There is no third choice here. So, the probability of drawing a face card OR not drawing a face car its:

so


but, we know that

so

