Answer:
There is no proximate cause between the breach of duty and the injury
Explanation:
Negligence is simply defined as the inability to take the right step or precautions to protect others from the risk of harm. it concerns harm that is as a result of an accident. In any case of negligence, The plaintiff must prove his/her point with the following reasons or elements to be able to win, if not loses.they are;
1. The Duty of Care - defendant had a duty of due care to the plaintiff.
2. Breach - defendant alter or breached this duty.
3. Factual Cause - defendant's conduct actually caused the injury.
4. Foreseeable Harm - looking ahead of the conduct like the defendant's might cause this type of harm.
5. Injury - plaintiff has actually been hurt.
Answer:
direct democracy
Explanation:
Did the quiz (k12) and got it right. It'd be awesome if you'd mark this as the brainliest answer :)
Answer:
yes it is for teacher but not for students
False assumptions
These assumptions are like their Donation is too Small, the assumptions that the Social responsibility programs are out to defraud,assumptions that the wealthy will give,lack of information on why, and who they should give among several biased assumptions.
