Hey there!
For Part A, because the amount earned on Sunday isn't specified, we can call this additional income x. Because we're writing an expression, we don't need an equal sign. The expression will be (x + 14).
For Part B, "2 less than" will mean "– 2" and "twice than" will mean the amount of dogs that Alicia walked times 2. We can call the amount that Alicia walked y to avoid confusion with the last expression (though you could use whatever variable here) and your expression will be (2y – 2).
Hope this helped you out! :-)
Answer:
-4x
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
Answer:
x = 9
Step-by-step explanation:
-2x = 18 - 4x
-2x + 4x = 18
2x = 18
x = 18/2
x = 9
