Answer:
Units sold exceeds units produced
Explanation:
The net operating income under variable costing system is always higher than absorption costing system when units sold exceeds units produced. As variable cost doesn't include fixed manufacturing overhead unlike absorption costing, when the net operating income under it now exceed that of absorption, it's definitely am increase in sales that's responsible for that.
Answer:
B) diminishing marginal utility
Explanation:
The law of Diminishing marginal utility states that utility falls as consumption increases.
The law of demand states that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded.
Because of diminishing marginal utility, consumption can be encouraged by reducing price.
As utility falls, consumers would be unwilling to buy more goods at the same price, therefore it would be reasonable to reduce price to encourage consumption.
It is difficult to compare relative job growth for different-sized
businesses because it is hard to determine the cutoff point at which a small
business becomes a large business. It is not easy to know the comparative job development
amongst businesses of different sizes. There are not the same parameters leading
the size of a small business versus a big business. Moreover, there is no defined
point where such a variation can be clearly identified.
Answer: Yes they did.
Explanation:
Apparent Authority refers to a scenario where a Agent is assumed to have the power to act on behalf of a Principal regardless of if said authority had not being expressly given whether implicitly or otherwise.
It is worthy of note that this power is only valid if the third party in the transaction assumes from the conduct of the agent, that they have such powers to act.
It is stated in the text that there was no question that the brokers had the actual or implied authority to sell the stock meaning that the Principal had not done enough to show that the agents did not have the Authority to act as they did. For this reason, they can indeed be sued under the Principle of Apparent Authority.
Answer:
$69,000
Explanation:
Percentage of shares owned by ABC in Teal's company = 30%
This is an example of equity method investment , and a portion of the attributable income at the end of the year is earned and added to the initial stock.
Attributable income is the remaining income after dividends have been settled.
<u>Workings</u>
The opening carrying value of the shares on ABC balance sheet = 60,000
Profit made at the end of the period = 40,000
Dividends paid = 10,000
Attributable income to share holders = 40000-10000 = 30,000
ABC portion of attributable profit = 30000*30% = 9,000
Carrying value at the end of the year = opening carrying value + portion of the attributable profit
=60000+9000=69000
