Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
Answer: Civil service, the body of government officials who are employed in civil occupations that are neither political nor judicial. In most countries the term refers to employees selected and promoted on the basis of a merit and seniority system, which may include examinations.
Explanation:
NOTES: Global mean surface temperature from 1880 to 2018, relative to the 1951–1980 mean. The black line is the global annual mean, and the red line is the five-year local regression line.
The report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of October 2018 showed that the difference in impact between 1.5°C and 2°C was very large. That 0.5°C increase would imply that, for example, the length of droughts would double, the occurrence of extreme weather events would more than double, and all the coral would be gone. That is why the UNFCCC Paris Agreement (COP21) of December 2015 – to which more than 190 countries have subscribed – wisely set the target of holding temperature increases to “well below 2°C” with efforts to hold to 1.5°C.
To have a reasonable chance of holding below 2°C, we have to cut emissions by around 40% absolutely in the next two decades. Much bigger cuts are necessary for 1.5°C.
<em>BONUS: </em><em>Global warming is the process of raising the average temperature of the earth's atmosphere, oceans, and land. The global average temperature on the earth’s surface has risen 0.74 ± 0.18 ° C over the last hundred years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that "much of the increase in global average temperature since the mid-20th century is most likely caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases due to human activity" [1] through the greenhouse effect. These basic conclusions have been expressed by at least 30 scientific and academic bodies, including all national academies of science from the G8 countries.. The climate model used as a reference by the IPCC project shows that global surface temperatures will rise by 1.1 to 6.4 ° C between 1990 and 2100. </em>
<em />
<em>I hope this helps!! </em>
<em>Have a great day/night :)</em>
<em />
