Answer:
1.122 m/s
Explanation:
So usually a river with a speed of 1 meters per second can transport particle that weighs:

If the particle is twice as massive as usual, then its weights would be 1 * 2 = 2kg
This means the river must be flowing at a speed of

Well, if I understand correctly, I think it'd be 60, because 60+60= 120, but I may be wrong. It's not my best subject, but why not try to help even though I suck lol.
Answer:
A: used has four times the tensile strength of steel and the timber frame, incorporating
Explanation:
Option A is correct because it conveys the correct message intended by the statement and has no grammatical errors.
Option B is wrong because to say "has four times the tensile strength of steel has" is just grammatically and idiomatically wrong as has is used twice in the sentence.
Option C is wrong because the statement that has to do with the flexibility of the timber's frame is more like a separate fact and does not fall under the scope of trying to further explain a fact.
Option D is wrong because it has the same problem in Option C. The comma that is placed after "steel" breaks the sentence and hence does not provide a good understanding of why the building can withstand earthquakes.
Option E is grammatically wrong for using does in the sentence "has four times the tensile strength steel does"
Answer:
It remains constant
Explanation:
As we know that buoyant force on an object given as
Fb = ρ Vd g
ρ= Density of fluid
Vd=Volume displace by body
g=10 m/s²
Fb =buoyant force
So from above we can say that buoyant force does not depends on the depth. It only depends on the fluid density and volume displace by body.
So when rock gets deeper and deeper the buoyant force will remain constant.
It remains constant
The answer is A, because it’s the first one