Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.
On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.
Answer:
Roman philosopher Seneca once said, “Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.”
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is because people should know who is coming into office, but they do not have the right to know why someone is being fired for private reasons.
Explanation:
It’s important for the hiring discussion to be made public by the city council since it relates to the use of public funds to compensate these additional workforces. In contrast, firing processes do not relate to incurring funds and thus the public does not need to know about the reasons of the firing.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Anyone can be a victim of fraud, there are sime out there that are sophisticated fraudsters and have created websites, etc that look legitimate with a security certification off of google.
Answer:
15.6%
Explanation:
Investment = $3200
Net savings = $500
Investment returns in % = Net savings/Investment × 100
= 500/3200 × 100
= 0.15625 × 100
= 15.6%
