Answer:
that is more of a claim.
Explanation:
try to take it more apart. whats ur claim?
Based on the following observations, the Malthusian theory was criticized: The population was growing quickly in Western Europe. The availability of food had also grown in the same period as a result of technological advancements. Food production has frequently expanded faster than population growth.
What are some criticisms of Neo-Malthusian theory?
Writers who argue that the Malthusian warnings were exaggerated or premature because the green revolution has significantly increased food production and will be able to keep up with ongoing population expansion have criticized the neo-Malthusian revival.
What are the main arguments against the Malthusian theory?
In essence, Malthus was mistaken about both population growth and technological advancement. Although he did not give an exact estimate, he suggested that in areas with plenty of natural resources (like The New World), the population would typically double every 25 years.
Learn more about Neo-Malthusian theory: brainly.com/question/13291281
#SPJ4
True because of its addictive trait and smokeable form
The answer in the spaces provided above are the following;
conditioned stimulus and unconditioned stimulus.
It is because classical conditioning occurs when the
individual has perceived the conditioned stimulus when the unconditioned
stimulus has been affected by a neutral stimulus.
