The conversational maxim that the professor violates is the relation. It is because professor discusses topics that are not related to the topic that she is going to discuss, which is why she is violating the relation. She focus her attention of discussing events that is happening on her life rather than focusing on teaching the topic that she should be teaching such as the tangents.
Explanation:
teachers are in the most strategic position to facilitate a balanced personality development and a more adequate adjustment of the learner. ... The teacher's own adjustment not only contributes to better adjustment of pupils but is essential for his own efficiency and happiness.
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
