Answer:
1. $ 750
2. - $ 50
3. $ 600
4. $ 600
Explanation:
1. Using the data GDP = C+I+G+ (X-M)
GDP= $500 +$100 + $ 200 + ($50-$100)
GDP= $ 800 + (-50)
GDP = $ 750
2. NET EXPORTS = EXPORTS - IMPORTS= $ 50- $ 100= -$50
3. PCE= Consumption+ Private Domestic Investment= $ 500 + $ 100= $ 600
4. GDP 2017= $ 750 *80%= $ 600
Answer:
B sell some
Explanation:
in a scenario where it is dropping, it doesn't mean it won't come back up. So you would sell some but keep a few so if it went up you still make profit
Answer:
$1,534.372
Explanation:
The computation of the expected level of the index in one year is shown below:
= Current index level × 1 + expected rate of return on the market - expected future value of the dividend paid over the next year
= $1,433 × (1 + 8.4%) - $19
= $1,553.372 - $19
= $1,534.372
We simply applied the above formula so that the expected level of the index in one year could come
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
