1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa86 [58]
3 years ago
11

In 1626, the Dutch bought Manhattan Island, now part of New York City, for $24 worth of merchandise. Suppose that, instead, $24

had been invested in an account that paid 3.5% interest each year. Find the balance in 2008.
Mathematics
2 answers:
Radda [10]3 years ago
5 0
2008 - 1626 -= 382

24 x (1.305)^382

= 12,229,955,10

Hope this helps
Talja [164]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The balance in 2008 is $12,229,955.10

Step-by-step explanation:

In 1626, the Dutch bought $24 worth of merchandise.

instead, $24 had been invested in an account that paid 3.5% interest each year, find the balance in 2008.

2008 - 1626 = 382 years

We calculate by compound interest formula :

A = P(1+\frac{r}{n})^{(nt)}

Where P = Principal amount ( $24)

           r = Rate of interest  3.5% ( 0.035 )

           t = 382 years

           n = number of compounding in a year ( 1 )

Now we put the values in formula

24(1+\frac{0.035}{1})^{(1)(382)}

= 24 ( 1.035 )^{382}

= 24 (509581.462506)

= $12,229,955.10

The balance in 2008 is $12,229,955.10

You might be interested in
Does any body know how to prove a parallelogram with statements and reasons
murzikaleks [220]
Because the lines are parallel,

The width of that rhombus, or parallelogram.

If you conutined that line, they will never ever touch.

That is the meaning of parallel, and why it is a parallelogram.

7 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know how to do this type of shape/figure
lara [203]

Answer: I think it is b

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Pls help asap show work thank you so much
serious [3.7K]
I hope this helps. If you need another explanation just message me

4 0
3 years ago
in comparing the galilean transformations with the lorentz transformations, what multiplicative factor appears in the lorentz tr
raketka [301]

In Lorentz transformations we have velocity based factors that is not present in Galilean ones.

<h3>What is lorentz transformations?</h3>

The relationship between two distinct coordinate frames that are moving relative to one another at a constant speed is known as a Lorentz transformation. Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz is credited with coining the name of the transformation. There are two frames of reference: Inertial Frames, which refer to motion that has a constant speed.

<h3>What are Galilean transformations?</h3>

The relationship between two distinct coordinate frames that are moving relative to one another at a constant speed is known as a Lorentz transformation. Dutch scientist Hendrik Lorentz is credited with coining the term transformation. There are two frames of reference: Inertial Frames, which relate to motion that has a constant speed.

Any and all rulers and other self-contained length standards, such as those you might use to set up a measurement frame, can be contracted in length based on velocity. This results in the Lorentz factor at the place in the LT.

Any and all clocks and other physically independent systems, such as those used to record events in a measurement frame, are subject to velocity time dilation. As a result, the LF is temporarily in the LT.

The fact that applying Einstein synchronisation individually for each measurement frame turns out to be natural. Consequently, the position-dependent synchronisation offset between the clocks of one measurement frame and those of the other is represented by the enigmatic second term in the LT for the time.

To learn more about transformations click the following link :-

brainly.com/question/1548871

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
Y=−3(2.5)x
Hoochie [10]

Answer:

1. The equation represent an exponential decay

2. The rate of the exponential decay is -3×2.5ˣ·㏑(2.5)

Step-by-step explanation:

When a function a(t) = a₀(1 + r)ˣ has exponential growth, the logarithm of x grows with time such that;

log a(t) = log(a₀) + x·log(1 + r)

Hence in the equation -3 ≡ a₀, (1 + r) ≡ 2.5 and y ≡ a(t). Plugging in the values in the above equation for the condition of an exponential growth, we have;

log y = log(-3) + x·log(2.5)

Therefore, since log(-3) is complex, the equation does not represent an exponential growth hence the equation  represents an exponential decay.

The rate of the exponential decay is given by the following equation;

\frac{dy}{dx} =\frac{d(-3(2.5)^x)}{dx} = -\frac{d(3\cdot e^{x\cdot ln(2.5)})}{dx} = -3 \times 2.5^x\times ln(2.5)

Hence the rate of exponential decay is -3×2.5ˣ × ㏑(2.5)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For this question you will need to analyze data given in file seed Emergence. For your convenience, the data is posted as a text
    12·1 answer
  • Need help in algebra quick
    9·1 answer
  • Please help its pretty easy
    11·1 answer
  • Convert -2.36 to a fraction in lowest terms
    15·1 answer
  • Multiply<br> ( 4x + 6y ) to the power of two 2<br> what is the answer?
    7·1 answer
  • HELPPP!!
    11·2 answers
  • Cuantos lados tiene un cuadrilátero y cuales son?
    13·1 answer
  • I need help can someone figure these out?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the circumference of a circle with diameter 24 m
    10·1 answer
  • 3 decreased by the difference of h and 5
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!