What is double entries for debit note received

The Federal Reserve System and the New York Stock Exchange regulations currently require the short seller to have an initial mar

lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

Correct answer is 50%

Explanation:

The appropriate response is half.

The Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board requires the equalization for all short deal records to be at any rate 150% of the estimation of the protections at the time the deal is started.

This implies when the short deal is started, as we are selling the offers first, our record will have the 100% estimation of the offers sold (as we receipts of cash from selling) in addition to an extra edge prerequisite of half of the estimation of the short deal.

For instance, on the off chance that I am short selling an offer whose cost is $100, at that point when I short sell the offer, my record equalization will become $100, as receipts of the deal.

Along these lines, at the hour of inception of offer, my record equalization ought to be 150% of the estimation of short deal = 150% of $100 = $150. The separation of this sum is

100% of $100 = $100, which gets credited to my record

in addition half of $100 = $50, which is the edge necessity at the inception of short deal.

In this way, Initial edge necessity is atleast half of the cost of the stock.

The student ought not befuddle the underlying edge necessity with the base upkeep edge.

The base support edge required to be kept up is 25%. This implies the short dealer ought to consistently have an edge (not balance) of 25% in the record. In the event that the edge goes beneath 25%, at that point the edge require the distinction sum is actuated, which the short dealer is required to pay to keep on keeping her situation in the market unaltered.

Be that as it may, beginning edge required to be kept up is half.

8 0

3 years ago

A customer sells 1 ABC Corporation put for 2 on February 22, 2019, with a strike price of 50 and an expiration date of March 16,

Deffense [45]

Answer: a. He has an acquisition cost of $4,800 and a date of acquisition of March 15, 2007.

Explanation:

A Put amount gives the holder the right to sell underlying assets. As the Put was exercised, the customer would have to buy the underlying stock and the price they will pay for it is the strike price of the Put less the cost of the Put.

Options contracts come in 100s so;

Acquisition cost = (50 - 2) * 100

= 48 * 100

= $4,800.

The date of acquisition is the day the put was exercised.

8 0

3 years ago

You short-sell 200 shares of Tuckerton Trading Co., now selling for $50 per share. What is your maximum possible loss?

Fed [463]

Answer:

The answer is D.

Explanation:

Short selling is a trading strategy that speculates on the fall or decline of a particular security price.

Here, investor borrows a stock from a dealet, sells the stock, and then purchases the stock back to return it to the dealer. Short sellers are hoping that the stock they sell will fall or decline.

The maximum possible loss is unlimited because the price increase (which will be at a disadvantage to the investor might not be known).

3 0

3 years ago

Find the accumulated value of $2,480 at the end of twelve years if the nominal interest rate was 2% convertible monthly for the

dusya [7]

In order to properly tackle this problem, we must understand the relationship between the nominal annual rate and real (effective) annual rate.

To do this:
-First you take the nominal rate, divide by the number of times it's compounded (converted) per year.
-Then, add one to that number, and raise that number to the power of how many times you compound per year.

Here is the method in practice:
First 3 Years:
Nominal rate= 2% ÷ 12 times/yr = 0.001667
Effective rate = 1.001667 ^12 = 1.020184

Next 2 Years (Discounting)
3% ÷ 2/yr = .015
1.015 ^ 2 = 1.061364

Next 4 years (Interest)
.042 ÷ .5 (once every 2 years) = .084
1.084 ^ (1/2) = 1.041153

The last 3 years are already expressed as an effective rate, so we don't need to convert them. The annual rate is:
1.058

I kept the 1 in the numbers (1.058 instead of 5.8% for example) so that it's easier to find the final number

Take every relevant number and raise it to the power of the number of years it's compounded for. For discounting, raise it to a negative power.
First 3 years: 1.020184 ^ 3 = 1.061784
Next 2 years: 1.030225 ^ -2 = .942184
Next 4 years: 1.041163 ^ 4 = 1.175056
Last 3 years: 1.058 ^ -3 = .84439

Multiply these numbers (include all decimals when you do this calculation)
1.062 * .942 * 1.175 * .844 = .992598

This is our final multiplier to find the effect on our principal:
.992598 * 2,480 = 2461.64

Answer is 2461.64

6 0

4 years ago

Which of the following statements is correct concerning product costs? A. Product costs are shown with current liabilities on t

Brut [27]

Answer: D. Product costs are expensed in the period the related product is sold

Explanation:

The statement that is true with regards to product cost is that product costs are expensed in the period the related product is sold.

It should be noted that the account for the cost of goods sold consist of product cost. In a situation whereby goods are not sold, the goods will be carried to the next period.

5 0

3 years ago