Answer:
Proof in explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm going to attempt this by squeeze theorem.
We know that
is a variable number between -1 and 1 (inclusive).
This means that
.
for all value
. So if we multiply all sides of our inequality by this, it will not effect the direction of the inequalities.

By squeeze theorem, if 
and
, then we can also conclude that
.
So we can actually evaluate the "if" limits pretty easily since both are continuous and exist at
.

.
We can finally conclude that
by squeeze theorem.
Some people call this sandwich theorem.
Answer: ? = 72
Step-by-step explanation:
We will set up a proportion to solve.

Now, we will cross-multiply.
? * 35 = 56 * 45
35? = 2,520
? = 72
I'm not completely sure but this is what I would do.
evaluate <span>(1/ 4)^x - 1 </span>as is. But change the (1 /2)^2x to (2/4)^2x. This way both fractions have the same denominator and in this sense, the same base. The 2/4 base still evaluates into 1/2 so nothing, mathematically, is being broken here.
The answer would most likely be C
Answer:I think the answer is x=25 sorry if im wrong ツ.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps you out ツ