The unemployment rate in this population is 12%
First of all we have to find the total labour force in this country
Children less than 18 + people in the military + people in jail + retirees + marginally attached workers + full time students
= 50million + 15million + 30 million + 10 million + 30 million + 20
= 155 million
Labor force = 280million - 155 million
= 125 million
In this population those working full time and part time are the number of those that are employed.
= 30 million + 80 million
= 110 million
The unemployed = 125 million - 110 million
= 15million
The unemployment rate =
= 0.12
The unemployment rate = 12%
Read more on brainly.com/question/15707932?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Dividend yield=10.3%
Explanation:
Mv=Do(1+g)/(Ke-g)
MV=?
Do=2.27
g=2.1%
Ke=14.56%
Mv=2.27(1+2.1%)/(14.56%-2.1%)
MV=2.75/(12.46%)
MV=$22.1
Dividend yield=dividend per share/share price per share
Dividend yield=2.27/22.1
Dividend yield=10.3%
Answer: It’s research the issues
Explanation:
The other answer is wrong
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :
a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.
b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.
c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.
