Answer:
Strictly speaking, Jefferson did not enact a reign of terror as happened in the French Revolution against the noble class. There were many controversies during the period that Jefferson was president and there were many who held different views than his.
Explanation:
The "reign of terror" is in reference to Jefferson's very public and vocal support of the French Revolution. The term "reign of terror" refers to the violence that was waged against elites and even the king and queen during the French Revolution. Jefferson was inspired by the principles of the revolution because he felt radical change was necessary to change the old monarchical regimes of Europe. The Federalists did not like this prospect because they wanted some continuity to the past -- they were in favor of a stronger central government and central bank and maintaining strong ties to England because of trade. Jefferson believed that the national government’s authority should be limited to just the powers expressly granted by the U.S. Constitution. More power should go to the states in the Democratic-Republican view.
Jefferson did not bring a reign of terror in the strict sense as America's revolution had already been won. But he was successful in championing the power of the individual states rather than a strong central government and the Federalists lost influence. Jefferson was also controversial in his persecution of his former vice president Aaron Burr and tensions with Chief Justice John Marshall who ruled there was no evidence of treason on the part of Burr despite the efforts Jefferson made to have him apprehended.
Answer:
I want to say B- spices but I'm not 100% sure. I'm so sorry if its wrong.
One invites the other over for lunch. The other IS lunch.
a cat is a feline
a mouse is a rodent
The nexus requirement holds that an act that is considered joint activity must have some relationship to the act of justice that the defendant is seeking to avoid.
The prosecutor must prove that the defendant acted on the basis of common sense necessary for the crime when he committed the voluntary act (or unlawful omission) necessary for the crime.
An error as to material fact may give rise to reasonable suspicion that the defendant possessed the degree of nexus requirements in the human common sense necessary to impose criminal responsibility so that such an error would be considered a lack of evidence. It is true that it is sometimes used as a defense.
Learn more about nexus requirements at
brainly.com/question/20736948
#SPJ4
