Answer:
z = 110°
Step-by-step explanation:
Angles z and the one marked 70° form an linear pair, hence are supplementary.
z = 180° -70° = 110°
<h3>Angles where chords cross</h3>
The angle made by two chords is half the sum of the arcs intercepted by those chords. Here, that means ...
70° = 1/2(60° +x) ⇒ x = 140° -60° = 80°
The arc w completes the circle of 360°, so we have ...
w +x +79° +60° = 360° ⇒ w = 360° -219° = 141°
Finally, z is the average of w and 79°:
z = (w +79°)/2 = (141° +79°)/2 = 110° . . . as above
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
the answer is 5100 im pretty sure.
Step-by-step explanation:
yes
Answer:
54 sq ft
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of a triangle is given by :
Area = (1/2) x base x height
in our case, if we assume the base of the right triangle to be 12 feet, then the height is 9 feet
Substituting this into our equation
Area = (1/2) x 12 x 9
Area = 54 sq ft
Answer:
(75 × 12) + (3 × 580) = 2640
Step-by-step explanation:
