Electrical energy is your answer.
Answer:
Lever => 
Pulley => G = M x n (gravitational acceleration)
Wheel and axle => M.A = Radius of the wheel/radius of the axle = R/r
Inclined plane => It can be divided into two components: Fi = Fg * sinθ - parallel to inclined plane. Fn = Fg * cosθ - perpendicular one.
It would have to be 36,719 Km high in order to be to be in geosynchronous orbit.
To find the answer, we need to know about the third law of Kepler.
<h3>What's the Kepler's third law?</h3>
- It states that the square of the time period of orbiting planet or satellite is directly proportional to the cube of the radius of the orbit.
- Mathematically, T²∝a³
<h3>What's the radius of geosynchronous orbit, if the time period and altitude of ISS are 90 minutes and 409 km respectively?</h3>
- The time period of geosynchronous orbit is 24 hours or 1440 minutes.
- As the Earth's radius is 6371 Km, so radius of the ISS orbit= 6371km + 409 km = 6780km.
- If T1 and T2 are time period of geosynchronous orbit and ISS orbit respectively, a1 and a2 are radius of geosynchronous orbit and ISS orbit, as per third law of Kepler, (T1/T2)² = (a1/a2)³
- a1= (T1/T2)⅔×a2
= (1440/90)⅔×6780
= 43,090 km
- Altitude of geosynchronous orbit = 43,090 - 6371= 36,719 km
Thus, we can conclude that the altitude of geosynchronous orbit is 36,719km.
Learn more about the Kepler's third law here:
brainly.com/question/16705471
#SPJ4
Kepler derived his three laws of planetary motion entirely from
observations of the planets and their motions in the sky.
Newton published his law of universal gravitation almost a hundred
years later. Using some calculus and some analytic geometry, which
any serious sophomore in an engineering college should be able to do,
it can be shown that IF Newton's law of gravitation is correct, then it MUST
lead to Kepler's laws. Gravity, as Newton described it, must make the planets
in their orbits behave exactly as they do.
This demonstration is a tremendous boost for the work of both Kepler
and Newton.
The problem is solved and the questions are answered below.
Explanation:
a. To calculate the speed of the 0.66 kg ball just before the collision
V₀ + K₀ = V₁ + K₁
= mgh₀ = 1/2 mv₁²
where, h= r - r cosθ
V = 
V = 2.42 m/s
b. Calculate the speed of the 0.22 kg ball immediately after the collision
y = y₀ + Vy₀t - 1/2 gt²
0 = 1.2 - 1/2 gt²
t = 0.495 s
x = x₀ + Vx₀t
1.4 = 0 + vx₀ (0.495)
Vx₀ = 2.83 m/s
C. To Calculate the speed of the 0.66 kg ball immediately after the collision
m₁ v₁ = m₁ v₃ + m₂ v₄
(0.66)(2.42) = (0.66) v₃ + (0.22)(2.83)
V₃ = 1.48 m/s
D. To Indicate the direction of motion of the 0.66 kg ball immediately after the collision is to the right.
E. To Calculate the height to which the 0.66 kg ball rises after the collision
V₀ + k₀ = V₁ + k₁
1/2 mv₀² = mgh₁
h₁ = v₀²/2 g
= 0.112 m
F. Based on your data, No the collision is not elastic.
Δk = 1/2 m₁v₃² =1/2 m₂v₄² - 1/2 m₁v₁²
= 1/2 (0.66)(1.48)² + 1/2 (0.22)(2.83)² - 1/2 (0.66)(2.42)²
= - 0.329 J
Hence, kinetic energy is not conserved.