Answer: 24429.02
Step-by-step explanation:
0.5 x 4 = 2 feet / 2 feet in 4 seconds
15 - 2 = 13
New depth: 13 feet
0.4 x 3 = 1.2 feet / 1.2 feet in 3 seconds
13 - 1.2 = 11.8
New depth: 11.8 feet
The conversion is


So

We're given the fairly unusual

It's fairly unusual because usually an angle is given in degrees or radians, and typically the radians are a fraction times pi. We'll assume radians.

Ah, there's our .75. The approximate answer is

Third choice.
The exact answer is

also a line through the origin.
Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let Leda's age is l and Pat's age is p.
<u>The expression would be:</u>