Answer:
D. Most music groups are made of 3 or more persons
Explanation:
It is quite uncommon to find that there are less than three persons in any music group. Although it is possible, the number of groups with less than three persons are quite less than the number of groups that are more.
By implementing this law that there can only be three people or less in the group does not decrease the amount of noise that is made but it does decrease the frequency that the noise is made.
This implementation will see fewer groups and reduced noise overall. However when the noise is made it is very likely that it will be just as loud as a band with more than three persons.
Answer:
A successful college experience can be described as the one in which a person is able to enhance his/her interest in a particular field. The teachers are excellent who help then to endure knowledge and make the experience memorable. Successful college life is the one in which a person is not only able to gain knowledge on his/her chosen subject courses, but also develops his personality and becomes a better human being. College life is very important in shaping a person.
Answer:
the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale.
Explanation:
Answer:
Informed consent.
Explanation:
Informed consent simply means a decision taken by or for an individual after being informed about the proposed research or procedures, risks, benefits, and details about a research or procedures.
There need to be or have a legal informed consent if you have described to your patient or participants the research or procedure you are going to do in detail.
The features of the informed consent process.
1. The act of learning the key informations about a clinical trial before deciding whether or not to participate.
2. It helps individuals to agree or disagree in participating, health care providers involved in the trial explain the details of the study and others.
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.