Answer:
E; The object is negatively charged
Explanation:
Here, we want to state the conclusion that can be drawn from a positively charged rod being attracted to an object.
Generally as we know, oppositely charged materials attract while the ones with same charges repel each other.
Thus, in this case, for the rod to attract the object, there must have been an opposite charge of negativity on the object
So we conclude that the reason why the rod attracted the object was because of the presence of opposing charges on both of them. And since the rod has taken the positive charge, it is only correct to state that the object is negatively charged
Answer:
Yes, if object has moved through a distance, it surely can has zero displacement. as displacement is a vector quantity depending on starting and ending position not on the path.
For example, 1 circle of motion has distance 2πR but 0 displacement.
Explanation:
Yes, zero displacement is possible if an object has moved through a distance.
Suppose a ball starts moving from point A and it returns back at same point A, then the distance will be equal to 20 meters while displacement will be zero.
I think there would be 2 oxygen atoms,
If h2o is two hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom then h2o has 2 potassium atoms and 1 oxygen atom, if you were to add them then together it would have 2 oxygen atoms, plz if I'm wrong correct me
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It is 35 minutes to the east of zero-hours right ascension. Explanation: The right ascension of a star basically determines the position of the star on the east to west co-ordinates system.