The "c) percent efficiency" could not be used to find the mechanical advantage of an inclined plane. There are two formulae that could be used to determine the mechanical advantage of an inclined plane which stated as MA = Length/rise and Wout=Win. MA is the mechanical advantage, Wout is the output force, Win is the input force, and "rise" is the height of the inclined plane<span>.</span>
Hi pupil here's your answer ::
_______________________________
Newton's Second Law of motion states that the rate of change of momentum of an object is proportional to the applied unbalanced force in the direction of the force.
ie., F=ma
Where F is the force applied, m is the mass of the body, and a, the acceleration produced.
Or in simplest language it is the force applied to a particular object of particular mass multiplied by the acceleration caused by force .
______________________________
hope that it helps. . . . . .
The longer you spend reading and thinking about this question,
the more defective it appears.
-- In each case, the amount of work done is determined by the strength
of
the force AND by the distance the skateboard rolls <em><u>while you're still
</u></em>
<em><u>applying the force</u>. </em>Without some more or different information, the total
distance the skateboard rolls may or may not tell how much work was done
to it.<em>
</em>
-- We know that the forces are equal, but we don't know anything about
how far each one rolled <em>while the force continued</em>. All we know is that
one force must have been removed.
-- If one skateboard moves a few feet and comes to a stop, then you
must have stopped pushing it at some time before it stopped, otherwise
it would have kept going.
-- How far did that one roll while you were still pushing it ?
-- Did you also stop pushing the other skateboard at some point, or
did you stick with that one?
-- Did each skateboard both roll the same distance while you continued pushing it ?
I don't think we know enough about the experimental set-up and methods
to decide which skateboard had more work done to it.
Answer:
It is calculated by dividing Resistance, R, by Inductive reactance, XL.
Explanation:
Q is called the Q factor of a resonance circuit. In a parallel resonance circuit, it is calculated by finding the ratio of the power stored in the circuit to the power distributed in the circuit. It is a way of measuring the quality of a circuit or how effective the circuit is.
Q factor is the inverse in the resonance series circuit.
Q factor of a resonance parallel circuit,
<h3>
Q = R/XL</h3>
R = Resistance
XL = Inductive reactance
Answer:
The final image relative to the converging lens is 34 cm.
Explanation:
Given that,
Focal length of diverging lens = -12.0 cm
Focal length of converging lens = 34.0 cm
Height of object = 2.0 cm
Distance of object = 12 cm
Because object at focal point
We need to calculate the image distance of diverging lens
Using formula of lens
The rays are parallel to the principle axis after passing from the diverging lens.
We need to calculate the image distance of converging lens
Now, object distance is ∞
Using formula of lens
The image distance is 34 cm right to the converging lens.
Hence, The final image relative to the converging lens is 34 cm.
