Answer:cultural differences in what is considered "beautiful"Nacirema
Explanation:This is term of America which is spelled backwards , it is a term used in anthropology and sociology to examines aspects of citizens in the United States of America. American Anthropologist uses this term to actual distance themselves and be able to look at Americans in an objective way , examining a culture that is one of their own.
"Body Ritual among the Nacirema"
Horace Mitchell Miner wrote a paper which focused on defining Nacirema focusing on the North Americans, he explained Nacirema , he allows a person to look at the North America at a distance and objectively , he describes Nacirema as the clean place with advanced market economy.
Answer:
It would help them travel places faster.
Explanation:
Those three primary rights are:
- <span>Personal security (which means that every person has the right to enjoy their life fully without being threaten/taken by others)
- Personal liberty (the right to choose the actions and directions of their life)
- Right of private property - (which is the right to obtain things such as house, land, factory, or other type of property)</span>
Answer:
psychopathology
Explanation:
Psychopathology is an area of knowledge that aims to study the psychic states related to mental suffering. It is the area of study that underlies psychiatry, whose focus is clinical.
It is a field of knowledge, a set of discourses with various objects, methods, questions: on the one hand, the biological disciplines and neurosciences are found in their bases, and on the other, they are constituted with innumerable knowledge from psychoanalysis, psychology, anthropology. , sociology, philosophy, linguistics and history.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
