This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
The ~unequal~ statuses of different individuals in a society. for example, a doctor has a higher social status than a janitor working at the same hospital. the doctor might be awarded for his work, while the janitor is mostly ignored. the doctor may also have come from a fairly wealthy family and received a good education, while the janitor may have had economic disadvantages and a poor quality education. so the doctor and the janitor are socially unequal. social inequality is very closely connected to economic inequality, so if you ever see the phrase "socio-economic inequality," that's why.
Lawrence Kohlberg became a 20th-century psychologist recognized commonly for his studies into ethical psychology and development.
Kohlberg's concept of moral development is a principle that focuses on how youngsters broaden morality and ethical reasoning. Kohlberg's principle shows that moral improvement occurs in a sequence of six ranges. The idea also shows that moral common sense is mostly targeted at searching for and retaining justice.
Kohlberg trusted a method of vignettes. He wrote up scenarios that concerned an ethical quandary and supplied them to his research subjects. He asked humans what they could do in each scenario after which asked them to provide an explanation for the reasoning in the back of their choice.
Lawrence Kohlberg's essential works are constructed from the idea of ethical improvement. This idea become developed via inspiration by the works of Jean Piaget. Kohlberg created this principle whilst analyzing at the University of Chicago for his bachelor's diploma.
Learn more about Lawrence Kohlberg here: brainly.com/question/5952757
#SPJ4
The african americans became fearful of going to polls to vote, because they would rather have their life then to vote. This affected the african americans participation, because that meant that there were less people voting for the Republicans (mostly people from the Union or North).
hope this helps
I think the international poverty line is 4000?
