Answer:
an electrically charged atom or group of atoms formed by the loss or gain of one or more electrons, as a cation (positive ion), which is created by electron loss and is attracted to the cathode in electrolysis, or as an anion (negative ion), which is created by an electron gain and is attracted to the anode.
Incomplete question. However, I provided a brief about Kinetic energy generation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Interestingly, Kinetic energy in simple terms refers to the energy possessed by a body in motion.
It is often calculated using the formula E = 
A good example of creating even more kinetic energy is a hand crank toy car that moves after you wind it a little, when the car moves it is generating another measure of K.E.
Because they are not supported by the results of any legitimate investigation
that's conducted in accordance with the Scientific Method.
You may say:
"Well then, teach both lines of reasoning,
and let each student decide for himself."
This is suggested by the same people who aren't ready to let their
fourth-grader choose his own clothing, dinner menu, or school.
And it sounds reasonable to a vast mass of citizens who have decided
for them selves that the jury is still out on climate change.
What I'm saying is this:
-- The Scientific Method is a METHOD of investigation that's designed
and developed to remove the effects of human prejudice from the
collection and evaluation of evidence, and to be able to tell bogus
conclusions apart from true ones. It's the most reliable way we have
of asking and answering questions about the natural world.
-- Some questions CAN'T be studied with the Scientific Method,
because experiments generally can't be constructed. These include
matters of religion and faith. Nobody can flatly state that those are
right or wrong. We have no reliable way to say, either way.
The only way to decide is . . . faith.
-- It is illegitimate to take the answer to a question of faith that can't be
derived scientifically, and a scientifically derived conclusion, set them
down next to each other on the same table, and pretend that they can be
compared.
-- When you put them next to each other, say that they're equivalent,
and tell people "go ahead and choose one or the other", the situation
is bogus, the comparison is dishonest, and people who are untrained
or uneducated or immature are not qualified to "choose".
That's why.
This is my opinion. I could be wrong.
Personally, I happen to be a believer. But I cannot prove anything I believe
to anyone else ... not with rational argument, and not with evidence. Those are
elements of the scientific method. They're not applicable, and they don't work,
in matters of faith.
Answer:
The magnitude of the resultant acceleration is 2.2 
Explanation:
Mass (m) of the sailboat = 2000 kg
Force acting on the sailboat due to ocean tide is 
= 3000N
Eastwards means takes place along the positive x direction
Then
= 3000N and 
= 0
Wind Force acting on the Sailboat is
= 6000N directed towards the northwest that means at an angle 45 degree above the negative x axis
Then
= -(6000N) cos 45 degree = -4242.6 N
= (6000N) cos 45 degree = 4242.6 N
Hence , the net force acting on the sailboat in x direction is
= - 3000 N + 4242.6 N
= - 3000 N +4242.6 N
= 1242.6N
Net Force acting on the sailboat in y direction is
= 0+ 4242.6N
= 4242.6N
The magnitude of the resultant force =
Using pythagorean theorm of 1243 N and 4243 N
4420.8 N
F = ma
=2.2
