The cause of a shift of a production possibilities frontier of an economy ab to cd is unemployment.
If an economy keeps growing its capital stock/range of employees/generation/herbal resources, then over the years its manufacturing possibilities curve will: shift to the proper .e shift of the frontier from A to B was maximum in all likelihood due to unemployment
. The curve bows outwards due to the law of increasing opportunity fee, which states that the quantity of an amazing which must be sacrificed for every additional unit of any other suitable is extra than become sacrificed for the preceding unit.
production possibilities curve. a graph or financial model that shows the most combinations of products and offerings, any two categories of goods, that can be produced from a set quantity of assets.
Learn more about the economy here:brainly.com/question/1106682
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. Current ratio
Explanation:
Current Ratio is the least likely to be affected
The Current Ratio is given as
Current Ratio = [ Current assets ] ÷ [ Current liabilities ]
Now,
Building a new plant is a fixed asset for the company.
Thus, It will add to the Fixed assets
Since,
The Formula for current ratio is independent of the fixed assets
Therefore,
It will be least affected.
While,
Debt to equity ratio = [ Debt ] ÷ [ Equity ]
Debt to asset ratio= [ Total Debt ] ÷ [ Total Assets ]
Net fixed assets to total assets = [ Net fixed assets ] ÷ [ Total assets ]
in all the above relations, fixed asset will change the value of the total assets.
Hence,
They all will be affected
Answer:
A and B.
Explanation:
Understand cost classification used for assigning costs to cost objects can be divided in direct costs and indirect costs.
Direct costs are those who can be easily and conveniently traced to a unit of product or other cost object. Examples are direct material and labor.
Indirect costs are those who cannot be easily and conveniently traced to a unit of product or other cost object. Example manufacturing overhead.
The common costs are the indirect costs incurred in support a number of cost objects. These costs cannot be traced to any individual cost object.
Determining cost tracing and allocation is more art than science, as it's difficult to trace costs with 100 percent accuracy.
Tracing costs becomes even more difficult when a cost goes toward producing multiple goods or services.
Answer:
The expected real value (in terms of January 1, 2009, dollars) of the depreciation charge in year 2013 will be $1,958,815.416.
Explanation:
It is expected that the value of the dollar in the German market will fall at the same rate as that of the real market value of the dollar when we envisage the exchange rate will remain the same. Thus the depreciation of the tax write-off in terms of its real value in dollars will fall at 5% every year from 2009 to 2013.
Therefore, at a tax rate of 50% in Germany, a $2.5 million charge on depreciation on the investment of $5 million will result in 2013.
To calculate the real value of the dollar at an inflation of 5% yearly in 2013
When the tax rate in German is 50%, then charges of depreciation of $5 million will equal4$2.5 million in 2013 dollars. When the dollar's real value of this write-off is declining due to the inflation at 5% annually, the real value in 2013 will be calculated as:
Given: $2,500,000 (P/F , 5%, 5years)
; 0.78356 (factor for calculating the amount to be recieved after 5years)
= $2,500,000 * 0.78356
= $1,958,815.416
