1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
3 years ago
13

Quillpen Company is unlevered and has a value of $45 billion. An otherwise identical but levered firm finances 25% of its capita

l structure with debt. Under the MM zero-tax model, what is the value of the levered firm? Enter your answer in billions. For example, an answer of $1 billion should be entered as 1, not 1,000,000,000. Round your answer to the nearest whole number.
Business
1 answer:
Alex_Xolod [135]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

We can conclude that the value of levered firm is 40 billion.

Explanation:

Under the MM zero tax model value of levered firm is equal to value of unleveled firm

Under MM zero tax model VL = VU

VL= value of levered firm  

VU= value of unleveled firm  

Value of levered firm = value of unleveled firm + (tax rate × value of debt)

Firm capital structure is included debt and equity , when there is no tax it means value of levered and unleveled firm value is same

Therefore, We can conclude that the value of levered firm is 40 billion.

You might be interested in
Melissa owns the following portfolio of stocks. What is the return on her portfolio? Stock Amount Invested Return A $8.000 17.5%
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

The option c is a right answer.

Explanation:

For calculating the return on her portfolio, the steps is to be followed which is shown below:

Step 1: First compute the weight-age of each portfolio.

Step 2: Multiply the weight-age amount to invested return.

Step 3: After multiply the amounts, the expected return comes.

Mathematically,

Step 1:  Weight-age is to be computed by

= Each Portfolio amount  ÷ total stock amount

where total stock amount = $8,000 + $4,000 +$12,000

                                           =$24,000

For A = $8,000 ÷ $24,000 = 0.3333

For B = $4000 ÷ $24,000 = 0.1666

For C = $12000 ÷ $24,000 = 0.50

Step 2:

Expected Return for A = Weight-age × invested return

                                      = 0.3333 × 17.5%

                                      = 5.83%

Expected Return for B  = Weight-age × invested return

                                      =  0.1666 × 11.0%

                                      = 1.83%

Expected Return for C = Weight-age × invested return

                                      = 0.50 × 4.30%

                                      = 2.15%

So, the total return on her portfolio is a sum of Expected Return for A + Expected Return for B +Expected Return for C

=  5.83% + 1.83% + 2.15%

= 9.81 %

Hence, the return on her portfolio is 9.81% .

Therefore, the option c is a right answer

5 0
3 years ago
Schwan's Sales Enterprises of Marshall, Minnesota, manufactures and markets a full line of frozen foods in 49 states using door-
xxTIMURxx [149]

Available options are:

A. direct channel.

B. indirect channel.

C. facilitated channel.

D. customer-service channel.

E. truck jobber channel.

Answer:

A. Direct channel.

Explanation:

The use of direct channel is prominent in the ice-cream industry which sales its products by using a music which triggers the sense that the ice-cream is just at my next step and the products at offers are from low cost to high cost to make maximum sales. The type of channel in which the salesmen sell their product by moving door to door is often refferred to as Direct channel.

3 0
3 years ago
Pat used to work as an aerobics instructor at the local gym earning $35,000 a year. Pat quit that job and started working as a p
Ivan

Answer:

$34,000

Explanation:

Accounting profit = Total revenue - Explicit costs

i.e Total revenue = $50,000

     Explicit costs = $12,000 + $1,000 + $3,000 = $16,000

Therefore; $50,000 - $16,000 = $34,000.

6 0
3 years ago
Countries are interconnected today as never before. From eating foods from different countries to singing along to songs perform
Nuetrik [128]
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings.  You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.

In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations.  However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.

I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in.  For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.

There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.

As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic.  We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.  

These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
5 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the reserve ratio is 10% when the Fed sells $25,000 of U.S. Treasury bills to the banking system. If the banking sy
andre [41]

Answer:

d $250,000; subtracted from

Explanation:

Sales of U.S. Treasury bills to the banking system by the Fed is a contractionary monetary policy that will reduce the money supply.

Based on the money supply multiplier, the amount of the reduction in money can be calculated as follows:

Amount of reduction in money supply = $25,000 / 10% = $250,000.

Therefore, if the banking system does NOT want to hold any excess reserves, <u>250,000</u> will be <u>substracted from</u> the money supply.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Income __________ when there is zero beginning inventory and all inventory units produced are sold. will be lower under variable
    5·1 answer
  • A stock that sold for $22 at the beginning of the year was sell- ing for $24 at the end of the year. If the stock paid a dividen
    14·1 answer
  • Esther is ninety years old, but she still shops for her own groceries every morning. When Esther was younger, she would head to
    12·1 answer
  • Ben is reviewing a chart that shows all of the employees at his company. This document includes information about who reports to
    10·1 answer
  • Which business risk is controllable
    15·2 answers
  • Fun! Inc. had total sales of $ 480,000 in 2014. The total cost of goods sold was $ 400,000 and the administrative and sales cost
    9·1 answer
  • To use the table of contents feature in Word, a user must have already created what in the document?
    10·1 answer
  • Define rent seeking. Rent seeking is attempting to transfer surplus from one group to another, for firms it usually involves: re
    8·1 answer
  • A new generation of lunch trucks in cities such as New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles is serving high-end fare such as ham
    12·2 answers
  • A check is__? (1 point)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!