Complete Question
The diagram for this question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
a E =
b E =
c E = 0 N/C
d 
e 
f V = 
g 
h 
i 
Explanation:
From the question we are given that
The first charge 
The second charge 
The first radius 
The second radius 

And ![Potential \ Difference = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1 }{r}+\frac{q_2}{R_2} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Potential%20%5C%20Difference%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%20%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%20%7D%7Br%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%5D)
The objective is to obtain the the magnitude of electric for different cases
And the potential difference for other cases
Considering a
r = 4.00 m


Considering b

This implies that the electric field would be

This because it the electric filed of the charge which is below it in distance that it would feel

= 
Considering c
r = 0.200 m
=> 
The electric field = 0
This is because the both charge are above it in terms of distance so it wont feel the effect of their electric field
Considering d
r = 4.00 m
=> 
Now the potential difference is

This so because the distance between the charge we are considering is further than the two charges given
Considering e
r = 1.00 m 
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} \frac{1.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 26.79 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2026.79%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering f

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.700} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 34.67 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.700%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2034.67%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering g

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering h

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering i

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the last option. If the volatility of X is higher than that of Y, then <span>Y’s molecules experience stronger London dispersion forces than X’s molecules. All molecules has london dispersion forces. Also, the stronger the bond, the harder it is to volatilize. Hope this answers the question.</span>
Answer:
<em><u>M</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>m</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u>:</u></em>
That will be
<em>=</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>5</em><em>0</em><em>0</em><em> </em><em>x</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>5</em><em> </em><em>x</em><em> </em><em>4</em><em>5</em><em>0</em><em>0</em>
<em>=</em><em> </em><em><u>1</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u>1</u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u>2</u></em><em><u>5</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u>0</u></em>
It would have to be cardio i think not totally sure
Explanation:
(a) The given figure is a convex lens.
(b) In this figure, the object is placed between F and optical center of a lens. Convex lens is a converging lens. It converges the beam of light falling on it after reflection. The image is formed on the same side of the lens as the object.
The formed image is enlarged and it is virtual and erect.
(i) Type : virtual
(ii) Orientation : upright
(iii) Size : Enlarged