<span>A topic idea that I find intensely engaging falls under the category of social philosophy: the concept of free will. Free will is best described as a human or living creature's ability to make decisions or actions for itself. This means, at any given moment, each individual has the opportunity to vastly change his or her's fate through a multitude of actions. Free will also assigns a deep responsibility to our actions, which can sometimes arouse fear or anxiety in certain people. However, another common social philosophy that counter-acts the idea of free will is destiny, or fate--the idea that humans have a pre-destined path laid out for them.
Although some people can argue that both destiny and free will can coexist, I find it really intriguing exploring the relationship the two ideas share. I enjoy these types of topics and questions because you can apply it to our own lives and challenge our own perceptions.</span>
Answer:
Appellate courts will typically grant a petition for a writ of mandamus where the lower court abused its discretion and where the petitioner has no other remedy. For example, if a trial court judge were to refuse to decide a motion, the moving party would be unable to appeal because the case has not yet ended.
This writ of command is issued by the Supreme Court or High court when any government, court, corporation, or any public authority has to do a public duty but fails to do so. Writ of Mandamus can be used to order a job to be done, or it may allow an operation to be stopped in other situations.
Explanation:
Here is start
Three human rights violations are:
The right to live free
<span>Freedom of move </span>
<span>Right to democracy
just add examples and you'll be set!:)
Hope this helps!</span>
