Rutherford's result can not be explained on the basis of the plum pudding model because of the fact that, since some alpha particles were deflected, the atom must contain a small region with a strong electric charge.
The empirical study of the atom led to the emergence of several models of the atom. In the Plum - pudding model, the atom was regarded as a positively charged sphere with embedded negative charges.
This model can not interpret the Rutherford experiment since alpha particles were deflected. The deflection of alpha particles means that, the atom must contain a small region with a strong electric charge.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/730256
Answer:
Slide a magnet through the mixture. When you take the magnet off, the iron filings are going to be attracted to the magnet and the sand will stay in the bowl
Explanation:
Answer: 6.022 x10^23 atoms
Explanation:
Answer:
Copper is a metal made up of copper atoms closely packed together. As a result, the electrons can move freely through the metal. For this reason, they are known as free electrons. They are also known as conduction electrons because they help copper be a good conductor of heat and electricity.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, considering the reaction, we can compute the Gibbs free energy of reaction at each temperature, taking into account that the Gibbs free energy for the diatomic element is 0 kJ/mol:
Thus, at 2000 K:
And at 3000 K:
Next, since the relationship between the equilibrium constant and the Gibbs free energy of reaction is:
Thus, at each temperature we obtain:
In such a way, we can also conclude that at 2000 K reaction is unfavorable (K<1) and at 3000 K reaction is favorable (K>1).
Best regards.