I believe the answer is D: To show how using a list of examples can strengthen a claim. Dr. King is using these examples to help support his claim, which will help to strengthen it. I hope this helps :)
Molecules with large molecular weights will not have potential inhalation hazards.
It is because molecules that have large molecular masses will also have a high boiling point. Now boiling point and vapor pressure are inversely related. So the vapor pressure of such molecules will be very low. Hence, there will no vapors available for inhalation.
A high molecular weight will increase the effective resistance of the fabric. The better diploma of entanglement manner that will rupture, the more polymer bonds need to be broken, because of this, the polymer can take in more electricity earlier than failing. Excessive molecular weight will increase the chemical resistance - to some extent.
Hence, these will not cause inhalation hazards.
Learn more about inhalation hazards here:-brainly.com/question/1788721
#SPJ4
...only if the policyholder would have preferred added risk over security.
A group of environmentalists were discussing the benefits and drawbacks associated with using fossil fuels. Which argument <span>best </span>fits the conversation?
Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy.Fossil fuel reserves will never be depleted.<span>Fossil fuels are easily renewed. </span><span>Fossil fuel use does not affect the environment.</span>
Answer:
36.75 grams of sulfuric acid will be required.
Explanation:
Moles of sodium hydroxide = 0.75 mol
According to reaction, 2 moles of sodium hydroxide reacts with 1 mole of sulfuric acid ,then 0.75 moles of NaOH will :
sulfuric acid
Mass of 0.375 moles of sulfuric acid:
0.375 mol × 98 g/mol = 36.75 g
36.75 grams of sulfuric acid will be required.