<u>Answer:</u>
Initial value: 250
Decay
Decay rate: 11%
Initial value: 40
Growth
Growth rate: 11%
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
The function we have on the left of the table is:
<u>Initial value</u> (when x = 0): 
y = 250 (initial value)
Growth or Decay: 0.89 < 1 so decay
Decay rate: (1 - 0.89) * 100 = 11%
Function on right side:
<u>Initial value</u> (when x = 0): 
y = 40 (initial value)
Growth or decay: 1.11 > 1 so growth
Growth rate: (1.11 - 1) * 100 = 11%
Answer:
a) The number of visits between the patrons who buys the season passes shows higher frequency than those who did not buy season passes, in general. However, the minimum value of 1 visit is present for both cases.
b) The mean visits of the patrons are just PARAMETERS. If you want to test your hypothesis using hypothesis testing, the statistics are the z or t scores comparing the parameters (means).
c) The proportion who would have paid less are those with 2 or fewer visits because they would only just paid $82 instead of $100.
Number of patrons with 2 or fewer visits: 16
Total number of patrons who bought season passes: 30
Proportion who would've paid less = 16/30 = 0.5333
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did it
-10x+7x=-3x
3x+1=37
(-1) (-1)
3x=36
(Divide by 3 each side)
3x divided by 3= x
36 divided by 3 = 6
Answer: x=6
It will cost her $8.55 at $4.75 a pound
can also be written as 2i
where i = √-1
Rationalizing denominator,
