1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
4 years ago
5

How does Nathan’s hypothesis lead to new investigations

Chemistry
2 answers:
Simora [160]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A) The data to support his hypothesis, so he should investigate if the same change happens in the density of solid water.

Brilliant_brown [7]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. The data to support his hypothesis, so he should investigate if the same change happens in the density of solid water.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
WILL GIVE BRAINLYEST!!!!!The number at the bottom of Silicon on the periodic table is 28.086. This number is the element's _____
Natalka [10]

Answer:

I don't

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A compound is 40% carbon, 6.7% hydrogen, and 53.3% oxygen. What is the empirical formula?
Ahat [919]

Answer:

                           O        H        C

Moles in 100g  3.33   6.65    3.33

Ratio                  1.00   2.00    1.00

Possible empirical formula = OH_{2}C

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Los fenomenos fisicos son cambios permamentes en la materia?
alexgriva [62]

Answer:

Explanation:

Try English please

5 0
4 years ago
Wht is the process of science cyclical and not a linear process??​
Dima020 [189]

Answer:The process of science is iterative.

Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.

Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …

4 0
3 years ago
What is the number of electrons will chlorine most likely gain/lose
LuckyWell [14K]

Gain 1.

This is because of Chlorine's placement on the periodic table. Chlorine is a Halogen, thus being located in group 17 or 7A. This means it is one of the closest elements to being a Noble Gas or group 18/8A.

Chlorine has 7 valence electrons, and in order for it to become a Noble Gas, it needs 8. Cl- is typically the symbol used to represent this as Chlorine needs to gain an electrons instead of lose; once Chlorine gains the electron, it will be stable.

This also means that Chlorine has a high ionization energy or, in simpler terms, it would be difficult to remove an electron from Chlorine.

Hope this helps!

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which unit is used for measuring atomic mass?
    9·1 answer
  • Calculate the molarity of a 10.0% (by mass) aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid.
    9·1 answer
  • What evidence reaction will be observed based on this chemical reaction​
    6·1 answer
  • How many moles of electrons are required to reduce one mole of oxygen gas (O2) to two moles of oxygen ions (O2-)?
    5·2 answers
  • NEED HELP! thank you!
    13·1 answer
  • A 1% solution of Ivermectin contains how many mcg per mL?
    9·2 answers
  • What is one way for a possible solution to reversing or counteracting the effects of climate change? What can we do at our homes
    12·1 answer
  • Plz help I need help plz ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • NaClO4/ HCIO4 is a buffer system ​
    5·1 answer
  • Describe one way the respiratory and nervous system work together​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!