He was not worry at all because he had a authority to act
Answer: (A)
Dr. Pulaski is likely to find that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
Explanation:
Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to find out to what extent people conform to group pressure.
He set up the experiment to include a single participant and seven confederates in a group. (A confederate is an accomplice of a researcher who is placed intentionally within an experiment by the researcher, so he can manipulate the experiment in his favor).
Each confederate was to give the same wrong answer to a certain question asked, while the participant was to provide his answer last.
Asch then observed if the single participant would tailor his answer according to the wrong answers provided by the confederates, or would provide the accurate answer.
Asch found out that from 12 trials conducted, "75% (three-quarters) of participants conformed to wrong answers provided at least once", while 25% did not conform at all.
He also discovered that on average of the trials carried out, one-third of the participants went along with the incorrect answer provided by the confederates.
Asch had also set up a control experiment with only a single participant and no confederates.
From the control experiment, he realized that less than 1% provided the wrong answer to the question asked.
Answer:
-When a plaintiff attempts to gain "home-court advantage" by fling his lawsuit in a courthouse close to his place of business
Explanation:
Forum shopping is the act of filling a lawsuit in a courthouse in which the plaintiff believes is likely to provide the most favorable outcome.
Forum shopping is a practice that occurs when filling a lawsuit, therefore a defendant is not able to practice forum shopping.
It is fair to assume that a plaintiff's place of business is likely to provide him the most favorable outcome.
I think the answer is memory or recalling memory, which i think is the same thing. I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
If richer regions can attract more investment than poorer regions because of their larger ex ante tax bases, then fiscal federalism adversely affects the growth prospects of poorer regions by reducing the resources available for either central or regional governments to fund valuable projects in poorer regions.Often geographical constraints, market imperfections, government policies, a lack of law & order, identity, per capita income and various socio-economic reasons can contribute to regional disparity such that some regions are more backward than other areas falling within the same nation
(hope it helps)
