Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
<span>Since the incident was handled according to protocol, The IRB should let the PI know it is okay to continue the study. The IRB will keep a close eye on the study to make sure another similar situation does not happen again.</span>
Answer:
They relied on the annual Nile flooding to create fertile soil.
Explanation:
This is because the Ancient Nubia lived with the Egyptians around the river Nile and they depend on river Nile for flooding and growing of grains. They were also know as those who posses archery skills including their women too. They were mostly buried with their archery equipment.
It is a symbol to let they know where they were so they didn’t get lost.
