<span>The UNESCO debate in the 1970s mainly revolved around the role of Media representation toward the development of what the organization referred to as the third worlds.
</span>
The debate resulted in:
- Increased documentation and greater awareness of the one-way Fow of media messages from core to peripheral nations
- Regional meetings of experts to discuss national communication policies. Key early meetings were held in Latin America
- .A resolution acknowledging both the right and responsibility of national governments to control the media messages available to their citizens; the resolution failed to pass
- .Neinternationalal requirements for satellite broadcasters, which passed with 100 votes
Answer:
1. False
2.True
3.True
4.false
Explanation:
Given that the difference surpasses the threshold level it means the experiment is highly significant according to statistics a p-value less than 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05) is statistically significant.
This shows that the null hypothesis is less than a 5% probability correct and the alternative is more than 95% correct.
Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis, and accept the alternative hypothesis as the correct hypothesis
Answer:
The best attitude to take is a proactive attitude, in order to be able to pass some important legislation during this period.
Explanation:
The reason is that most presidents enjoy above-average approval during the first days of their mandate, and this approval not only translates in a more favorable opinion of citizens, but also in a more positive environment in Congress, in which congress people are more willing to work where the president in order to pass legislation.
Answer:
CSRS pensions equal 1.5% of high-three average pay for each of the first 5 years of service, 1.75% for the 6th through 10th years, and 2.0% for each year of service after the 10th year. This formula yields a replacement rate of 56.25% for a worker who retires with 30 years of service.
Explanation:
The reasoning used in determining the action taken in this question is inducting reasoning, using strong arguments. Induction reasoning is a type of reasoning where premises (evidence of something that occur or something that has factual basis) helps an individual in coming to a conclusion based on these premises.
It’s clear that the writer’s previous experiences with Charlie’s drinking and subsequent obnoxious behaviors in the past parties that they’ve attended together led her or him to think that this behavior would appear again, thus making strong arguments to not invite Charlie to the next party.