Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Since there isn't a line under the < sign, this means that we used a dotted or dashed line. The dotted or dashed line indicates that we do NOT include the boundary as part of the solution set.
Since y is isolated and we have a less than sign, this means we shade below the dashed/dotted boundary line. Specifically, the boundary line is the graph of y = 2x+1. This boundary line goes through (0,1) and (1,3). Again, points on this boundary line are NOT part of the solution set.
So in summary we have:
A dashed or dotted boundary line
The shaded region is below the dashed/dotted boundary line.
Answer: The answer is C on edg.
Step-by-step explanation: I got it right
You can’t really know the y value unless you’re told that they’re both directly proportional. if so, then check out the pic
