Answer:![F_{net}=\frac{kq^2}{(L)^2}\left [ \frac{1}{2}+\sqrt{2}\right ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_%7Bnet%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7Bkq%5E2%7D%7B%28L%29%5E2%7D%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%2B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%5Cright%20%5D)
Explanation:
Given
Three charges of magnitude q is placed at three corners and fourth charge is placed at last corner with -q charge
Force due to the charge placed at diagonally opposite end on -q charge
where 
Distance between the two charges
negative sign indicates that it is an attraction force
Now remaining two charges will apply the same amount of force as they are equally spaced from -q charge
The magnitude of force by both the charge is same but at an angle of 
thus combination of two forces at 2 and 3 will be
Now it will add with force due to 1 charge
Thus net force will be
A force over distance is work the unite is joules
Working of a Half wave rectifier
The diode is connected in series with the secondary of the transformer and the load resistance RL. The primary of the transformer is being connected to the ac supply mains. The ac voltage across the secondary winding changes polarities after every half cycle of the input wave.
Answer:
velocity = 1527.52 ft/s
Acceleration = 80.13 ft/s²
Explanation:
We are given;
Radius of rotation; r = 32,700 ft
Radial acceleration; a_r = r¨ = 85 ft/s²
Angular velocity; ω = θ˙˙ = 0.019 rad/s
Also, angle θ reaches 66°
So, velocity of the rocket for the given position will be;
v = rθ˙˙/cos θ
so, v = 32700 × 0.019/ cos 66
v = 1527.52 ft/s
Acceleration is given by the formula ;
a = a_r/sinθ
For the given position,
a_r = r¨ - r(θ˙˙)²
Thus,
a = (r¨ - r(θ˙˙)²)/sinθ
Plugging in the relevant values, we obtain;
a = (85 - 32700(0.019)²)/sin66
a = (85 - 11.8047)/0.9135
a = 80.13 ft/s²
Seven
The magnitude is pointing towards the origin and is at - 20 degrees. The combination makes 160 with the x axis: C answer
Eight
They keep doing this. They use distance where they should use displacement but they use distance to try and fool you. It's a mighty poor practice.
The distance between the start and end points is the displacement. That "distance" is 180*sqrt(25) = 900 . The actual distance should be 180*4 + 180*3 = 720 + 540 = 1260. That's what a car's odometer or a bicycle odometer would read. the difference is 360.
I really do object to the wording, but what can I do?
Nine
Nine is the same thing as 8.
Displacement = sqrt(400^2 + 80^2)= sqrt(166400) = 408
The actual distance is 400 + 80 = 480
The difference is the answer = 480 - 408 = 72 <<<< Answer
Ten
This is just the displacement magnitude.
dis = sqrt(30^2 + 80^2)
dis = sqrt(900 + 6400)
dis = sqrt(7300)
dis = 85.44 <<<< Answer D
Twelve
Vi = 2.15*Sin(30) = 1.075 m/s
vf = 0
a = - 9.81
t = ?
<u>Formula</u>
a = (vf - vi)/t
<u>Solve</u>
-9.81 = (0 - 1.075)/t
- 9.81 * t = -1.075
t = 0.11 seconds
Thirteen
I'm leaving this last one to you. You need the initial height xo to answer it properly. Judging by the other questions, this one is right.
Edit
That is a surprise! Really quickly
d = 3.2 m
a = - 9.82
vf = 0
vi = ?
vf^2 = vi^2 - 2*a*d
0 = vi^2 - 2*9.81*3.2
vi = sqrt(19.62*3.2)
vi = 8.0 m/s But that is the vertical component of the speed
v = vi/sin(25)
v = 8.0/sin(25) = 11
