Answer:
tell Tia she should be able to make it until the next break, which will be in just twenty minutes. to let Tia use the restroom, but to pay attention during subsequent class bathroom breaks, encouraging her to go then.
Explanation:
Answer:
celiac disease
Explanation:
Celiac disease is An autoimmune disease characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation and varying degrees of intestinal mucosal atrophy with associated malabsorption.
It can also be an antigen driven enteropathy of the small intestine, resulting from an inappropriate immune response to dietary gliadin, a component of wheat proteins.
Celiac disease can manifest in the following ways;
Diarrhea / Steatorrhea - increased osmotic load, bile malabsorption in ileum, poor motility, colon bacterial action
-Flatulence
-Weight loss
-Distension, cramping
The associated symptoms of celiac disease was what Thompson was experiencing, in that case He should be evaluated for same.
Answer:
the answer is c
Explanation:
once you once you search up then add on the second part it will narrow it down
Answer: B) cognitive dissonance.
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance is defined as the effect which produces cognitive behavior attitude or thoughts in a person leading to mental discomfort.This uneasiness feeling can create moderation in attitude ,view or behavior of person for regaining balance of mind and eliminating discomfort.
According to the question Nadia's feeling of uneasiness can be related with cognitive dissonance as she is discomforted because of buying from a brand that is into child labor scandals and she is against child labor.This is causing conflict in her mind and producing discomfort.
Other options are incorrect because exposure effect, consensus effect and self-objectification are not the effect that is causing uneasiness feeling in Nadia .Thus, the correct option is option(B.)
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A fallacy is an error reasoning. The slippery slope fallacy is a common fallacy.
The slippery slope fallacy happens when the speaker attempts to move away from a question at hand by arguing that a decision could cause spiral or multiplier consequences. These consequences are blamed on the question at hand rather than decisions that could be made to bring about these consequences.